Friday, February 23, 2007
First of all… Isn’t Daniel Radcliffe a minor??
Secondly.. Oh my! Should we even be looking?? Gah!
And thirdly, is that even real? Photoshop? What?
He is a minor in the USA but he is not a US citizen so our laws don’t apply i think in the UK at 16 you can be in porn.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 02/24 at 07:55 AMPhotoshopped. Good god, he’s got legs like Hulk Hogan in that pic.
Posted by mikerzz on 02/24 at 10:38 AMi have seen some of those pics. they make me feel like a pervert. ok, i guess i am one for looking…
Posted by antisocialite on 02/24 at 05:58 PMReal or not…..I say you start a poll of Hawt or Not…
Posted by richard on 02/25 at 12:16 PMI came home to find the boyfriend viewing this pic. I was wondering myself if it was photoshopped or not.
Turns out it’s real. And here’s the backside.
Posted by Frankie on 02/25 at 01:55 PMIt’s actually photoshopped - but well enough to fool some gossip rags.
The main clue is that there is a blurry, horizontal area mending the upper and lower torso - a sure sign of attaching another pic. Second, the pubic hair is cloned as you can see some cloning artifacts and third, the horse’s leg would be visible to at least a minor degree on the lower half of the photo and it’s not.
A good job though
The butt shot, however, is real though I don’t know if it’s Daniel or not. Why would that ONE SHOT be in colour if all the rest of the photoshoot was in B/W?
Posted by M@ on 02/28 at 12:16 AM
Next entry: Moblog Entry
Previous entry: Gimme Five!